Tag: Neighbour

Dividing Fences

May 5, 2010

In New Zealand it is the Fencing Act 1978 which governs the requirements for Dividing Fences, there were a few amendments and the Act was reprinted on the 1st August 2009.

 

The Act further covers two specimen types of fences detailed in Schedule 2 of the Act they are as follows:

 

URBAN

 

1.     Post and rail fence – a post and rail fence, at least 1 m in height, or substantial material, firmly erected, with not less than 4 rails, the space between the 2 bottom rails, and the bottom rail and the ground, not to exceed 125mm, and the posts to be not more than 2.75 m apart.

2.     Close boarded fence – a closed boarded fence at least 1.5 m in height with post rails, and having split or sawn timber placed upright, and well nailed to both rails, there being no openings between upright pieces of timber.

3.     Paling fence – any paling fence, at least 1 m in height, with posts and 2 rails, and having split or sawn timber placed upright, and well nailed to both rails, there being no more than 100 mm of opening between upright pieces of timber.

4.     Panel fence – Any panel fence at least 1 m in height with posts spaced not more than 2.7 m apart and having 2 or more rails with asbestos cement infill panels securely screwed to the rails.

5.     Masonry walls – Walls of brickwork, block work, or stonework adequately supported.

 

The other specimen is rural but this will not be covered in this article.

 

Disputes can arise between neighbours over the cost and materials in relation to dividing fences and the process for resolution is as follows:

 

Firstly you must understand what is defined as an adequate fence in the Act which states “if its nature, condition and state of repair are reasonably satisfactory for the purpose it serves or intended to serve”.

 

If you require your neighbour to contribute to the cost and material and this cannot be resolved amicably you are required to service notice on the neighbour. The Act sets out the best form to utilise in schedule 1 of the Act.

 

In effect the neighbour will have 21 days to either confirm they will contribute half the cost or dispute the notice, whereby they then serve you with a cross notice.

 

If you have received no response within the 21 days it will be deemed the neighbour has accepted your proposal.

 

Further more if the dispute cannot be resolved it will need to be heard in the Dispute Tribunal in New Zealand for amounts up to $7,500.00.

 

Remember to post your comments and feed back or alternatively contact us for advice or topics you would like covered. :)

Dividing Fences

October 22, 2009

This information is contained in the Fencing Act 1978, so what does it mean to you? A fence under the Act is considered adequate if its nature, condition and state is satisfactory for the purposes it serves. There are different types for fences for urban and rural properties. If there is no dividing fence and you want your neighbour to contribute to the cost then you are required to serve notice. The notice must;

1.  State the boundary along which the work is to be done.

2. The work to be carried out – identifying the nature of the work and materials to be used.

3. What will happen if the neighbour doesn’t reply.

4. Estimate of the cost involved.

The best approach is to discuss the matter openly with your neighbour and the majority of the time you will find most people are obliging, and will come to the party to pay half of the cost.

The neighbour has 21 days to either:

1. Confirm they will contribute half of the cost or

2.  Or dispute the  cost and serve a notice back outlining their objections and make a counter proposal.

If the neighbour does not respond within 21 days, the law will treat the neighbour as accepting the proposal.

If you and your neighbour can not come to an amicable resolution then the dispute could be resolved through the disputes tribunal or district court.

Stay posted for further great information

Albizia Theme designed by itx